Web Analytics

The Burtch lands return: why it’s so important

The Burtch lands return: why it’s so important

BURTCH —Six Nations Elected Council says Ontario will transfer title to the Burtch lands to a corporation established by the Elected Chief and Council. The return of those lands to Six Nations was part of the negotiations to remove road blocks along Highway 6 during the Caledonia Reclamation in 2006. According to Elected Council’s August newsletter, the Six

BURTCH —Six Nations Elected Council says Ontario will transfer title to the Burtch lands to a corporation established by the Elected Chief and Council.

The return of those lands to Six Nations was part of the negotiations to remove road blocks along Highway 6 during the Caledonia Reclamation in 2006.

According to Elected Council’s August newsletter, the Six Nations Farmers Association will farm the property once drainage work at the site is completed.

A History lesson on Burtch

The tract of land known as the Burtch Tract was part of the Haldimand Tract. It was made manifest by Joseph Brant on behalf of ‘the Mohawks and such others’ of the Six Nations who accepted the land grant directly from the Crown in recompense for lands lost after the American Revolution. It was once estimated to be 930,000 acres, six miles on either side of the Grand River, from source to mouth.

As part of land negotiations following the standoff near Caledonia’s Douglas Creek Estates, now known as Kanohnstaton, former Premier David Peterson promised Six Nations the Burtch lands in exchange for the removal of road blocks on Highway #6.

The promise however, was only for a small portion of the 5,223 acre Burtch Tract.

That small portion was turned into an airport and military training base during WWII.

Following the conclusion of WWII in 1949, Ottawa turned the property over to the province. It became a correctional facility, until it closed in 2003.

But much earlier, David Burtch and received a 999-year lease for land on the South Side of the Grand River.

Burtch directly received the lease from Joseph Brant in the very early 1800’s before Brant’s death in 1807. This became known as the Burtch Tract, with Burtch’s Landing, now known as Newport, as access to the River.

Several pre-confederation documentations show that the leasing of parts of the original reserve (Haldimand Tract) was approved and even suggested by the Lieutenant Governor of Upper Canada, “for the benefit of their children.”

In April of 1829, John Brant, the Haudenosaunee Chiefs, and the settler government were negotiating a surrender of 807 acres to be used as a ‘settler reserve’ — a place to move squatters England promised to remove from Haudenosaunee reserve lands (Haldimand Tract).

The removal of squatters from the rest of the tract was a condition of the surrender.

This squatter reserve later became known as Brantford, and it was also no gift.

Moneys derived from the sale and lease of these town plots, as drawn up by surveyor Lewis Burwell, were to go to the benefit of the Six Nations. Many of these plots were never paid for, or if they were, there is no record of the money ever making it into the Six Nations Trust Fund established by the government to administrate Six Nations funds.

The area selected was surveyed and mapped by Louis Burwell and John Brant personally.

A mere six years later, in 1836, the Haudenosaunee Chiefs petitioned the government that they were not upholding their end of the bargain by expelling squatters from their Haldimand Tract land. This same empty promise was made by three successive Indian Agents.

At an Executive Council meeting Sept. 12th, 1840, it was recommended that Six Nations lease its Haldimand Tract land and not sell it. This would allow non-Natives to live with and alongside the Haudenosaunee while providing revenue for the People of Six Nations in perpetuity.

In November 1840, just two months later, Jarvis began floating the idea of surrendering all of the Haldimand Tract, except for areas Six Nations wanted for their own, exclusively.

Burtch was one of those areas as were the Oxbow, Eagles Nest, the Johnson Settlement and the Martin Tract.

In fact, the entire south side of the Grand River from Cayuga to Burtch’s Landing was once set aside as part of those reserved lands talks.

Almost every “surrender” of land in and around Brant/Brantford was conditional upon the removal of squatters from their land and the institution of a lease system, which would bring financial stability to the Six Nations people forever.

In subsequent years, leases were sublet and subleased over and over again until the government arbitrarily declared Brant Leases were to be turned into patents, in effect stealing thousands of acres of rightful Six Nations land and the future financial security of Six Nations.

The Burtch Tract was specifically not included in the purported Six Nations land surrender of 1841, which has since been recognized by the government to be void.

It was under heavy protest only weeks after the, so-called surrender was signed by 6 Six Nations chiefs, some with vested interest, others without full knowledge of what they were signing.

By tradition and by law, all 50 chiefs were to sign any agreement that affected Six Nations lands and people.

Then, in Feb. of 1844, Jarvis comes out and frankly states that there is no way the government is going to remove squatters from the Tract.

By 1845, Six Nations Chiefs Council compromised their stand for the entire Burtch Tract, making provision for whites already settled on that tract, but insist that 2,600 acres of the Tract remain as part of the new proposed reserve.

The entire Burtch Tract is 5,223 acres, according to early surveys. Lands with improvements made by early settlers were 1,763 acres, which Six Nations were willing to discuss as a separate issue. But the government bluntly informed the Chiefs that they would not include any of the Burtch Tract in the reserve lands.

Behind the scenes, Indian Agents, and government officials, and even map maker Lewis Burwell, were promising certain settlers that they would get first dibs on the Burtch land once the 55,000 acre new proposed reserve was settled, without the Butch lands included.

Settlers with legitimate leases were informed to be ready to relocate when their leases expire.

In June of 1847, Six Nations Chiefs declared again that they do not wish the Burtch Tract to be sold. Again, on Nov. 20, 1847, Council clearly stated they would not sell off the Tract, even after the government suggested the sale would provide enough money to buy new farm implements and seed to every farmer at Six Nations.

Ignoring all Six Nations protest, Supt. General Major T.E. Campbell drew up the plans of Reserve #40, not including the Burtch Tract, on Jan. 18th, 1848.

In an 1851 report from MP David Thorburn to the Honourable R. Bruce, Superintendent General of Indian Affairs, he says that it was “with great difficulty” he got the Six Nations to sell the Burtch Tract. But there is no documentary evidence to support the notion that the Tract was ever surrendered. If it happened, it is obvious it was done without Six Nations approval or any such due process as required by British law through the Royal Proclamation of 1763.

Fast forward 180 years, and the arguments and evidence regarding the Burtch Tract still have not been dealt with. But now the water is even murkier.

Since the 1840’s and 1850’s; an Elected System of government was brought to Six Nations mirroring British law, the Haudenosaunee Confederacy Chiefs Council is overcoming the effects of colonization and there is some misgivings over the operation of the Haudenosaunee Development Institute acting as land agents for communally owned assets.

The Mohawk Workers, are also seeking what they believe is their inheritance, and insist on being at least included in decisions by either party in their name.

The Workers believe the Haldimand Proclamation was no “gift” but was made as compensation for Mohawk lands lost following the American Revolution, and was a document directed towards themselves and others of the Six Nations who wished to give up their traditional territories to join Brant in 1784.

For them, neither the Elected Band Council nor the Haudenosaunee Confederacy Chiefs Council have any right to make deals with Mohawk lands without their say.

Advertisements

Share this Article!

Jim Windle

Jim Windle

Jim Windle is a veteran news and sports reporter who has been published in a number of mediums and publications. contact Jim: windlejim@rocketmail.com

Related Posts

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply
Advertisements

Share this Article!

Two Row Times

Two Row Times

LIVE NOW! CLICK TO VIEW.
CURRENTLY OFFLINE