Web
Analytics Made Easy - StatCounter

There is no Indigenous Britain

There is no Indigenous Britain

SIX NATIONS – When Britain first tried to superimpose British Common Law over its self-proclaimed colonies in North America and elsewhere, they were faced with a new wrinkle they had not encountered before — Indigenous people. Historically, when they could get away with it, genocide was the first tool in the tool kit. But where

SIX NATIONS – When Britain first tried to superimpose British Common Law over its self-proclaimed colonies in North America and elsewhere, they were faced with a new wrinkle they had not encountered before — Indigenous people.

Historically, when they could get away with it, genocide was the first tool in the tool kit. But where they could not, for whatever reason, they tried to retro-fit the old law to fit their new reality.

These people, that had no concept of owning land, were in the way and had to be removed, one way or the other.

According to the law they had perfected over time, you could not simply kill the inhabitants and move in. At least not legally. They already had the stamp of approval from the Pope to remove all “heathens” from the land and take their possessions if they do not conform to Christian belief.  This was based on one verse found in the Bible taken out of context from the book of Proverbs 13:22 which states, “A good person leaves an inheritance to his grandchildren, but the wealth of the wicked is reserved for the righteous.” Some translations say “heathen” rather than “wicked” which was to say, acknowledged that there is a Great Spirit God, but actually meant anyone who does not pay haulms to the church.

The reality was, even if you did surrender all you have, chances are you would be enslaved, killed or jailed anyhow.

This obviously profitable misinterpretation became the “legal” backbone of the colonization-for-profit models followed by the Dutch, French, Spain, Portugal and others, but none more so than the Britons.

The other way land can be transferred from one people to another is by way of conquest, as in the historical wars and counter wars that formed Europe itself. Generally, one army would send a message to the other asking for surrender or face sure annihilation. When that happened, the people were rounded up and used as slaves or, in time, melted into the community. Although it was a brutal choice, “legally” there was a choice given —give up your land and possessions or die.

That satisfied the religious and the economic goals of the ruling class, Britain.

There are no Indigenous peoples of Briton although there is a succession of journeys of early man, including the most northerly Neanderthal skeletal remains found dated being 400,000 B.P. (Before Present). But there was no lengthy stay for any of them. As the Ice Ages came and went, so did early man.

Before the Romans, in 53 and 54 B.C., there were Gauls, Celts, Saxons, and Flemish, that even the powerful Roman Legions could not totally eradicate. But all of these early inhabitants came from Europe when there was no English Chanel between Briton and mainland Europe.

In more modern times, after the wide land bridge connecting Briton to mainland Europe disappeared under the rising ocean water, more permanent inhabitants arrived and built societies, one succumbing by conquest or assimilation to another ever since.

So when the Magna Carta became the standard by which canonized the basic rights of people in Europe in 1215, there was no provision for an indigenous race of people, so it was easier to simply consider them to be subhuman and not worthy of human status or treatment and therefor outside of the provisions of the Magna Carta.

According to Professor Sidney Herring author of “White Man’s Law”, the fledgling North American experiment had to be made up as it went, in relation to indigenous land title anyway. The British model did not fit.”

This created large and obvious inconsistencies that today’s indigenous people around the world and at home, are still dealing with today. It also necessitated the purging of unflattering history, but that became impossible to hide with the advent of the information age.

Now, what is being faced is the clash between what is legal and what is right. How much justice can Canada actually afford after illegally building almost the entire country on Six Nations trust funds without permission and without recompense.

The steps forward are slow and small and some are understandably getting impatient.

To those who adhere to the Great Law, Six Nations ancestors have been here since man emerged and have followed a parallel path to that of “the old world” but oblivious to each other.

To those not willing to believe that Indigenous North America was in some ways just as or more civilized than those who came to stay, a new and fresh look at history, anthropology and archaeology is being written every day. And there is a lot to learn.

1 comment

Posts Carousel

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

1 Comment

  • steven bent1
    November 21, 2017, 12:04 pm

    The validity of the Doctrine of Discovery is destroyed because of the fact that it is insisted to be the ‘only’ Godly dispensation of God’s law. However there were at least two and likely three early existing written bodies of law which contained a form of the 10 commandments among others of these kingdoms. Now we have a conundrum as when the Bible was the most antiquated and prolific and highly edited dogma held venerable during the times while Europe entertained this madness of Divine Selection. These were known existent or publically released early writings available to the public at that time. However, since that time more accurate information has surfaced and we now know of these bodies of law which predated the Decalogue given to Moses on the mountain and which are too similar to be coincidental. We have a situation where the ‘Most Holy goD’ is imitating Satan and man by essentially copying the 603 commandments known as the JEWISH TORAH and of which we are taught there are only 10. Further Moses received these from a man- see Exodus 18:7 (Moses did obeisance to Jethro- bowing and touching your head to the ground in WORSHIP of another man a sin before goD) and Exodus 18:17-19 & 24 (Jethro instructs Moses on how to conduct the religion which Moses explicitly follows) which was confirmed by Jesus as of the DEVIL (John 7:19: Did not MOSES give you the Law ; John 8:39-41;44 you do the deeds of your father; you are of father the DEVIL); (Matt 23:23 for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, JUDGEMENT, MERCY, and FAITH: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.) Even the very person upon whom this current paradigm is established refutes the Doctrine of Discovery as he espoused that his kingdom is not of this world (John 18:36) or else he would have had his disciples fight. Further also goD stated that He would make the Kingdom of the Son not humans on earth (Matt 22:44, Mark 12:36, Luke 20:43, Hebrews 1:13). There is only one who is actively trying to establish a KINGDOM on earth and it is not the Great Spirit as His already is established and is in heaven and the current paradigm is trying to upend that. These shows that there is subterfuge employed to justify an illegal possession and dominion and make this illegal act an Act of God or an Act to please God which if it does further verifies the truth shown by 2 Samuel 24:1 and 1 Chronicles 21:1 two different authors writing about the same incident and which outs LORD as SATAN. It is my assertion that the kingdoms that the COLONIALISTS are trying to establish to be those Kingdoms which Jesus was tempted with-Matt 4:8 all the Kingdoms of the world are in fact the Kingdom of their father the DEVIL. Jesus even had to instruct the JEWS that the Father is a Spirit and they had to worship Him in Spirit and Truth- not animal sacrifices. Since we have a veritable history which predates the Bible and the Israelites demonstrated by Chief Joseph of the Nez Pierce and his clay tablet of 2024 BC coupled with his oral history written down by whites establishes an older and consistent timeline than the advent of ABRAHAM, ISRAEL, and the JEWS, CHRISTIANS and MUSLIMS. If the JEWISH oral history was committed to print circa 700 BC after 1000 years of oral transmission and is still considered to be the accurate word of goD our oral history is proven out to be as accurate.

    REPLY

Headquarters:


Oneida Business Park Suite 124
50 Generations Drive, Box 1
Ohsweken, ON N0A 1M0
Six Nations of the Grand River Country


Email: info@tworowtimes.com


Main office: (519) 900-5535


Editorial: (519) 900-6241


Advertising: (519) 900-6373

Latest Posts

Two Row Times

Two Row Times