Web Analytics

A letter from Samual Peters to Josheph Brant: A twist on history

A letter from Samual Peters to Josheph Brant: A twist on history

Sifting through our old documents we found a very interesting letter drafted in 1803 by Ontario Land Surveyor, Samuel Peters, believed to be Samuel Jarvis’ great nephew or grandfather. If so, it would show without doubt how much can change in a relatively short time regarding relationships between the Haudenosaunee and settlers in the Grand

Sifting through our old documents we found a very interesting letter drafted in 1803 by Ontario Land Surveyor, Samuel Peters, believed to be Samuel Jarvis’ great nephew or grandfather.

If so, it would show without doubt how much can change in a relatively short time regarding relationships between the Haudenosaunee and settlers in the Grand River area.

While the many indictments against Jarvis are staggering in his abuse of power while Superintendent of Indian Affairs, eventually leading to the fraudulent surrender of most of the Haldimand Tract, Peters was not cut from that cloth.

The handwritten letter is a personal one to Brant, it is not an official government document, however it clearly shows how not all settlers, or even government employees were complacent about the abuses of the Christian Church in sanctifying theft and religious bigotry by wrapping it in a pseudo-Christian veal, for power, wealth and greed.

The letter is long and goes into several issues, but a few remarks from this government employee of 1790s and very early 1800s. Remember, this is only a few years following the migration of the Mohawks under Joseph Brant along with others of the Six Nations in 1784 to 85.

It appears Peters knew Brant on more than a political level and felt comfortable enough to express his thoughts regarding how North America was stolen in the name of the Pope.

On this Community Awareness Week, we take a look back to those who came before and, rightfully or wrongfully, helped establish and shape the Six Nations of the Grand River community.

It appears Peters was quite knowledgeable of the difference between Christ and what is called the Christian Church and was openly critical of the latter.

“The Christian rulers are good and excellent; yet few Christians of the Roman and Protestant kind love or practice those rules — what is remarkable to me is that Popes, Bishops, Nobles and Kings who ought to be wise in doctrine and example, are the greatest strangers and enemies of Christianity,” reads the letter.

Peters, a churchman himself, living in London Ontario at the time of writing, went on to explain to Brant why European governments and clergy have felt they were doing God’s will by robbing First Peoples of their land, language, culture and even their lives.

“The Pope in 1492, gave, by his Bull to the King of Spain, all America, only because the Pope was, by his claim, the successor of Christ to whom God had given the heathen for his inheritance, and the western parts of the earth for his possession,” Peters writes.

“Had the Apostles and Christian Bishops, for the first six hundred years understood Christ’s words, that he has ‘other sheep that are not of this fold,’ which he will gather, the Pope would not have been content with the triple crown, which represents Asia, Africa, and Europe, but would have put on a quadruple crown to include America.

“What right then, would the Pope in 1493 have over America when (Paul) and the other 11 apostles hold no commission in America or over America. Hence, as the King of Spain had no valid title to America from the Pope, what right has the King of England in and over America, who is an excommunicated heretic from the Church of Rome?”

Peters then comes to a startling conclusion, which he shares with Brant.

“I consider you sir, as the Chief of the Mohawks, and the other five nations of Indians, the legal and just owners of the country lying between the waters St. Laurence, Ontario, Lake Erie, Lake Champlain, and Hudson’s River to the forks of Susquehanna.”

“I conclude that the people of America, belonging to the fold of Christ, not to the fold of the 12 apostles, because God gave America to Christ as said in Ps.2 vs 8 of the Christian Bible. (Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession.)

“The Pope, Kings and (Bishops) in the old world, have not, and never had any divine authority in America over Christ’s sheep, the Gentiles; of course they are usurpers, robbers and deceivers.”

He then challenges Brant and his Mohawks to lighten up on their treatment and attitudes towards the Mississaugas.

“You have lust for fighting your gentile (non-Jewish) brethren in behalf of English Christians and the good and honourable Mississauga have, in part, lost their country for fighting you, their gentile brethren, in behalf of French Christians. Thus I see you and the Mississaugas have been crucified like Christ between two thieves (re) Jews and Romans.”

The letter also reveals that Samuel Peter Jarvis, whom Peters called Nikik, was adopted by the great Warrior Chief, Pontiac and wanted Brant to liaison with Pontiac to allow his young relative to live with and study under him. He was not aware that Pontiac had already died by the time the letter was written.

 

Share this Article!

2 comments

Jim Windle

Jim Windle

Jim Windle is a veteran news and sports reporter who has been published in a number of mediums and publications. contact Jim: windlejim@rocketmail.com

Related Posts

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

2 Comments

  • Huck Kowa
    September 4, 2016, 7:18 pm

    so the letter is digitized and downloadable in .PDF* !!!!?????

    and steven love it!!!
    only suggestion i have is term “European” be used when referring to whites, canadians, colonizer…
    used singly as European or can group term it like , European-Canadian, European-whites, European-Colonizer….

    dis-empower them , like they do with terms; African-American , American-Indian , ….
    we are American , ohkwehonwe , anni-yun-wah-a , …

    REPLY
  • steven bent1
    May 24, 2016, 11:34 am

    There is an absolute litany of written documentia which supports the causes of originals contained within the libraries of Parliaments both here and in the Imperial purview. The issue so far is that those documents have been mined from the COLONIZER viewpoint and only those supporting ideas are re-articulated while the information giving the larger and true picture about the reality of original affairs is ignored. This is called promotion whereby a certain ideology is raised and defended against defeat by employing all of the political and emotional encumbrances which might be devised such as caricaturization of Indians as demons or idolaters thus making them enemies of the God who most CANADIANS pray to and which ‘color’ is educated into all CANADIANS though it is received very differently by Indians than whites. This article above shows that Christians ‘were sit back and live off the profits’ rather than defend the principles expounded by Jesus and that they profited upon the extermination of original’s land and natural resources and were just as inertial as the ordinary Christian Germans during Germany’s genocide and may have been praying to the same God whom the Allies were praying to- each for the defeat of each other (a house divided can not stand). However it is time to use our colonized re-education to pour through their literature so as to expose their genocidal mindset and help them heal by reintroducing the truth. After all as long as the ABUSER is in the house there will be abuse and as long as the ABUSER is not healed then abuse will continue. Their belief (and that is all it is- a belief system) is rooted in the Laws of man introduced by Moses yet claimed to be written by God (something He probably wants nothing to do with considering how they have been abused upon mankind) and yet the same Bible states that Moses bowed (did obeisance EX 18:7) unto another man and did all that that man told Moses to do (EX 18:24). Man’s religions are capable of causing great destruction and this is borne by Jesus having to come and straighten out the misinformed by telling them they were worshipping the Devil and doing his deeds (John 8:41;44) and admonished them to worship God in Spirit (John 4:24) and in truth which tells us they were not doing it right. Jesus also distinguished that their laws were not of His Father but of their father (John 8:17) who He identified as the devil.
    It is noteworthy that the belief in the Great Spirit was endemic in original culture here on Turtle Island and was so from antiquity as borne out by our oral history. Chief Joseph had in his possession a Sumerian tablet dated to 2040 B.C. which outdates even the Jewish people and which oral history associated with said tablet tells of commerce and other intercourse with the Mediterranean cultures for a thousand years previous and that we also shared ideology and genes. In fact Turtle Island is littered with ‘stonehenges’ which predate England’s and which information was shared with those cultures who still worshipped the sun. We taught them the ‘hitching post of the sun’ which are the calendric portions of the Medicine Wheel which demonstrated that the sun and moon were on a leash and were fixed in the courses being therefore creations. Telling indeed is the Jewish story of Abraham in a cave and charting the sun and moon in their courses to understand they were creations. I postulate that the knowledge that the Creator is a Spirit was given to the “West” by us at that time….

    REPLY
 width=

Headquarters:


Oneida Business Park Suite 124
50 Generations Drive, Box 1
Ohsweken, ON N0A 1M0
Six Nations of the Grand River Country


Email: info@tworowtimes.com


Main office: (519) 900-5535


Editorial: (519) 900-6241


Advertising: (519) 900-6373

Most Recent Articles

Share this Article!

Two Row Times

Two Row Times

LIVE NOW! CLICK TO VIEW.
CURRENTLY OFFLINE