Web Analytics

Haldimand Patent: A Mohawk Perspective

Haldimand Patent: A Mohawk Perspective

As the Haldimand suggests, the Mohawk of Grand River are under a different footing than others of the Six Nations. Maybe I can explain why, but first I need to comment about the negotiations between the federal government, the province of Ontario, Elected Council and the Six Nations Confederacy. I find it very ironic that the

As the Haldimand suggests, the Mohawk of Grand River are under a different footing than others of the Six Nations. Maybe I can explain why, but first I need to comment about the negotiations between the federal government, the province of Ontario, Elected Council and the Six Nations Confederacy.

I find it very ironic that the parties at the negotiating table have no treaties and yet believe that they have rights to dispose of Haldimand lands.

I suggest with research, anyone can find that the Six Nations do in fact have treaties of their very own, the treaty of Canandaigua in 1794 and the Buffalo Creek Treaty of May 20, 1842.

These treaties are with the United States and signed by the Chiefs and Warriors of the Six Nations with no Mohawk signatories or Mohawk participation.

On April 7, 1779, a registered document was delivered to the Mohawk called the Haldimand Pledge promising Mohawks for our steady attachment to the King’s service and for loss of our lands during the war Haldimand wrote “the same should be restored at the expense of the government to the state they were in before these war’s broke out.” Then in 1784 the Haldimand patent was manifested which bears the Crown Seal of England.

We would like people to know Mohawks are in possession of the original Haldimand document and do not support or condone the present day negotiations under Canada’s land claim policies. I’ll explain why.

Mohawks walked out of the negotiations at a time when the Six Nations Confederacy accepted a band council resolution to take the lead roll and accept funding, putting the Confederacy under Indian Act status and to this very day have not projected any sort of sovereign stand as a government.

Mohawks are currently pursuing a land claim based on an application to the international court at The Hague, filed May 26, 1967: the Mohawk Nation against Canada, as successor of Great Britain.  This claim was filed by an international lawyer, Omar Z. Ghobashy, J.D., Ph. D., who said, “the act to provide for this disposition of Indian land claims, registered June 21, 1965, in the House of Commons of Canada Bill C-123.”

By Canada setting its own appointed commission, the Canadian government is taking the dual position of defendant and judge and he advised the Mohawks that the Haldimand should never be subject to judicatory under this Act.

Currently the courts of Canada only recognize the band council as the legal representatives of Six Nations lands allowing the county and the city of Brantford to negotiate land issues with the elected band council under the terms of the Indian Act or the Six Nations Confederacy under the terms of the Simcoe Deed of 1793 whom the signatories are the Chiefs of the Six Nations.

A map of Brantford surveyed by Lewis Burwell on January 26, 1833 clearly shows Brantford in possession of 807 acres and was completely surrounded by Mohawk farms and lands under lease.  This then raises unanswered questions such as; “Was this land ever sold? Was it ever purchased? Were Mohawk land owners ever compensated? Were the leases ever paid?” leaving Mohawk lands disappearing and land questions unresolved. This is a direct violation of Mohawk land rights and of our human rights therefore we as Mohawk people are appealing for support from decent people to whom justice and peace is important.  We are open to advice and advocacy in our struggle to have our voices heard.

Archived Letter
from the Late “Bill Squire”

 

Share this Article!

1 comment
Letter to the Editor

Letter to the Editor

Send your letters to letter@tworowtimes.com

Related Posts

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

1 Comment

  • Nicole
    May 29, 2019, 10:36 pm

    for further consideration of the Simcoe Grant of 1793. it is clearly documented that Joseph Brant refused the proposed Simcoe Grant of 1793 in an excerpt of a letter (also printed in Two Row Times) written by Governor Simcoe himself, to his superior Lord Dorchester on Dec.22 1795, two years after the "proposed" grant. however, it is still this fraudulent Simcoe Patent of 1793 that is used for all Six Nations Land claims. Joseph Brant and the mohawks firmly rejected the Simcoe Grant as it was created for the province of Upper Canada and names "Six Nations" (as the government entity and corporation, and extension of the federal government through the imposed Indian Act and band council system) as signatories to Haldimand Lands and places them under Canada’s jurisdiction, as subjects and not Allies. How then, with a documented refusal, can the fraudulent Simcoe Patent of 1793 be recognized and upheld as legitimate and true and be used for land claims involving Haldimand (mohawk) territory? also, there is even a 1996 court case document that states "Six Nations" has NO TREATIES… ??? how can all this be happening with completely fraudulent documents? and so it crumbles… time to look at the deep rooted corruption imposed yet again on the good people of "Six Nations" with an open heart and make some positive change for the good of all the people, starting with a foundation of TRUTH and UNITED as one. true onkwehon:we

    REPLY

Headquarters:


Oneida Business Park Suite 124
50 Generations Drive, Box 1
Ohsweken, ON N0A 1M0
Six Nations of the Grand River Country


Email: info@tworowtimes.com


Main office: (519) 900-5535


Editorial: (519) 900-6241


Advertising: (519) 900-6373

Most Recent Articles

Share this Article!

Two Row Times

Two Row Times

LIVE NOW! CLICK TO VIEW.
CURRENTLY OFFLINE